德國台灣同學會

 找回密碼
 註冊
搜索
查看: 2964|回復: 10

小孩剖腹產 罹患氣喘機率高

[複製鏈接]
發表於 2008-12-3 05:28:22 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
研究發現,剖腹產的小孩,8歲前罹患氣喘的機率比自然生產的小孩要高80%,而如果父母都有過敏病史,小孩患氣喘的機率更高。


研究約以3,000名嬰兒為調查對象,結果發表於胸腔醫學期刊(Thorax)。


英國廣播公司(BBC)2日報導,該研究團隊調查了2917名孩童,當中247名為剖腹產。發現約12%的孩童,8歲前曾被診斷要求吸入類固醇治療,表示他們在8歲以前曾患氣喘。有9%的孩童,父母皆有過敏病史,他們得到氣喘的機率,是無過敏父母的孩童的3倍。


研究領導人、瑞典蘇黎士兒童醫院的羅杜德博士表示,氣喘比率在工業國家中較高,在1970年代患病比率增加了5%,在2000年更增加了30%。


她表示,剖腹產會增加氣喘機率,研判原因之一是,剖腹產孩子在出生的過程,沒有接觸到母親產道中的細菌,可能會影響嬰兒發展免疫系統。


之前此類研究曾引起爭議,但羅杜德博士表示,此研究母體樣本充足、研究時間夠長、且氣喘的定義包括曾被診斷要求吸入類固醇治療,以確保此研究之可信度。


現代剖腹產增加,通常是應母親要求,而非醫療理由。她表示,「在此情況,尤其胎兒父母都有過敏症狀,更應說明剖腹產易導致氣喘機率。」


http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/081203/2/1ahwh.html

評分

參與人數 1短評 +1 收起 理由
wang.hurh + 1 感謝分享

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-3 08:56:32 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 ann4995 於 2008-12-3 05:28 發表
研究發現,剖腹產的小孩,8歲前罹患氣喘的機率比自然生產的小孩要高80%,而如果父母都有過敏病史,小孩患氣喘的機率更高。


研究約以3,000名嬰兒為調查對象,結果發表於胸腔醫學期刊(Thorax)。


英國廣播公司(BBC)2日報導,該研究 ...



凱蒂貓大王!!!

可不可以麻煩你下這一篇文章啊!??

我必須要用力看一下這一篇文章!

多謝大王了啊!!!

評分

參與人數 1短評 +1 收起 理由
mmarta + 1 是說那最近變成了 Hello Kitty 的大王嗎? ...

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-3 12:54:25 | 顯示全部樓層
[quote
]英國廣播公司(BBC)2日報導,該研究團隊調查了2917名孩童,當中247名為剖腹產。發現約12%的孩童,8歲前曾被診斷要求吸入類固醇治療,表示他們在8歲以前曾患氣喘。有9%的孩童,父母皆有過敏病史,他們得到氣喘的機率,是無過敏父母的孩童的3倍。


研究領導人、瑞典蘇黎士兒童醫院的羅杜德博士表示,氣喘比率在工業國家中較高,在1970年代患病比率增加了5%,在2000年更增加了30%。


她表示,剖腹產會增加氣喘機率,研判原因之一是,剖腹產孩子在出生的過程,沒有接觸到母親產道中的細菌,可能會影響嬰兒發展免疫系統。


之前此類研究曾引起爭議,但羅杜德博士表示,此研究母體樣本充足、研究時間夠長、且氣喘的定義包括曾被診斷要求吸入類固醇治療,以確保此研究之可信度。


現代剖腹產增加,通常是應母親要求,而非醫療理由。她表示,「在此情況,尤其胎兒父母都有過敏症狀,更應說明剖腹產易導致氣喘機率。」

[/quote]

氣喘的治療一共分成四個等級:
第一: 短效的吸入性支氣管擴張劑
第二: 長效的吸入性支氣管擴張劑
第三:  吸入性類固醇
第四: 服用類固醇
一班都是先嘗試低等級的藥物
所以照上面的敘述 我要想想小孩子為何要用到吸入性的類固醇
而非其他的東西 原因是什麼 是因為氣喘嗎?

氣喘原因不外乎:
外在過敏的病原 或是內再的免疫細胞過度反應
但是他敘述的原因和理由應該無法說服其他人
才會引起爭議

所以我個人認為此文章看看就好
不要當真
參考就可以了

評分

參與人數 3現金 +11 短評 +1 收起 理由
mmarta + 1 感謝分享
wang.hurh + 5 我很贊同
clamiyuki + 6 感謝分享

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-3 16:13:18 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 wang.hurh 於 2008-12-3 08:56 發表



凱蒂貓大王!!!

可不可以麻煩你下這一篇文章啊!??

我必須要用力看一下這一篇文章!

多謝大王了啊!!!


我已經用盡了各種辦法
但都搜不到這篇原文
誰能告訴我它究竟在哪

評分

參與人數 1短評 +1 收起 理由
wang.hurh + 1 找了一下,應該是那一篇(見回文) ...

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-3 16:33:37 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 Koenig 於 2008-12-3 16:13 發表


我已經用盡了各種辦法
但都搜不到這篇原文
誰能告訴我它究竟在哪



報告:
Roduit C, Scholtens S, de Jongste CJ; Asthma at 8 years of age in children born by caesarean section. Thorax, 02 Nov 2008

===============================================

同時連一下原文:

Caesarean increases asthma risk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7755439.stm

Babies born by Caesarean section are more prone to developing asthma, say Dutch researchers.

In a study of almost 3,000 children, birth by Caesarean was associated with a 80% increased risk of asthma by age eight compared with vaginal birth.

The association was even stronger in children whose parents had allergies, suggesting a genetic predisposition to the disease, it is reported in Thorax.

Previous research has linked Caesareans with the development of allergies.

In total, the team looked at 2,917 children, 247 of whom were born by caesarean.

....................

=====================================================

[ 本文最後由 wang.hurh 於 2008-12-3 16:34 編輯 ]
發表於 2008-12-3 16:47:11 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 leomartin21 於 2008-12-3 12:54 發表
[quote
]英國廣播公司(BBC)2日報導,該研究團隊調查了2917名孩童,當中247名為剖腹產。發現約12%的孩童,8歲前曾被診斷要求吸入類固醇治療,表示他們在8歲以前曾患氣喘。有9%的孩童,父母皆有過敏病史,他們得到氣喘的機率,是無過敏 ...





另外,

也可以看看這一篇



==============================================================

Caesareans and asthma

http://www.nhs.uk/news/2008/12De ... reansandasthma.aspx

“The rise in asthma… over the past 30 years may have been driven by an increase in caesarean births”, reports The Independent today.

The story is based on Dutch research following almost 3000 children from birth to the age of eight, which looked at methods of birth and the risk of having asthma. It explored a theory that during a caesarean babies are not exposed to bacteria that would normally kick-start their immune system, and that this can lead to allergic conditions such as asthma.

The study has some limitations, including the broad method it used to diagnose asthma which may not be accurate. In addition, the researchers did not consider several factors known to raise the risk of asthma such as smoking in pregnancy. Further research is needed.

Asthma has a range of potential risk factors, both genetic and environmental, but it is unlikely that its sole ‘cause’ is mothers having a caesarean section.

Where did the story come from?

This research was carried out by C Roduit from the National Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, and colleagues from other institutions in the Netherlands.

The study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Netherlands Asthma Foundation and the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Support. It was published in the peer-reviewed medical journal, Thorax.

What kind of scientific study was this?
This was a cohort study investigating whether children delivered by caesarean section were more at risk of developing childhood asthma. Over the past decade, the incidence of both asthma and caesarean deliveries has risen in the Netherlands, where the study was conducted.

There is a theory that babies born by caesarean may have delayed exposure to microbes compared to those born vaginally, affecting their immune system and, in turn, leading to allergic responses such as asthma.

In the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA) study, 4146 pregnant women had their children followed up to the age of eight years. Thirty-two percent of these women were categorised as being allergic and the rest were non-allergic based on their responses to common allergens.

From all the children in the study, 1327 with an allergic mother and 663 with a non-allergic mother were selected for closer follow-up. This included blood tests measuring their allergic response to certain common allergens. Questionnaires were given to the mothers prior to delivery, three months following delivery and then annually from one year of age.

At the age of eight years, full data was available on 2917 of the total 4146 children in the study. Of the children selected for close follow-up, 1703 had full blood test data.

Asthma was diagnosed if in any of the annual questionnaires, parents reported one or more attacks of wheeze, shortness of breath or prescription of inhaled steroids in the past 12 months. Chronic asthma was defined if there was ‘asthma’ at any time between three and seven years and also at eight years.

Information was also obtained on other potential risk factors for asthma, including birth details and whether the child was breastfed, number of siblings in the family, smoking during pregnancy, maternal education, maternal age and maternal height and weight.

The researchers assessed the association between asthma at age eight and method of delivery while adjusting for the most relevant of the other risk factors.

What were the results of the study?
Of the total children followed-up, 51% had non-allergic parents, 40% had one allergic parent and 9% had two allergic parents. Of the total 2917 children with full data, 8.5% were born by caesarean section. Among children born by caesarean section, low birth weight, growth restriction and prematurity were more common than in those born vaginally.

Of the total children in the study, 12.4% (362 children) had asthma at eight years old. Asthma was higher among children with one or more allergic parents than with two non-allergic parents. Most children with an asthma diagnosis aged eight, also had a diagnosis between three and seven years. Caesarean section increased the risk of asthma (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.51).

In sub-group analysis, this association was even stronger in those children with one allergic parent (OR 1.86) or two allergic parents (OR 2.91) and was actually not statistically significant in children with non-allergic parents (OR 1.36). Blood tests at age eight found there was only a significant association between caesarean section and allergic sensitisation in children with non-allergic parents (OR 2.14).

What interpretations did the researchers draw from these results?
The researchers made the conclusion that children born by caesarean section have a higher risk of developing asthma, particularly if they have allergic parents.

What does the NHS Knowledge Service make of this study?


..........................

============================================================================
發表於 2008-12-3 16:48:29 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 wang.hurh 於 2008-12-3 16:33 發表



報告:
Roduit C, Scholtens S, de Jongste CJ; Asthma at 8 years of age in children born by caesarean section. Thorax, 02 Nov 2008

===============================================

同時連一下原文:

Ca ...


好奇怪
這篇在PubMedThorax裏都找不到
是不是還沒刊出 ???

評分

參與人數 1短評 +2 收起 理由
wang.hurh + 2 我也找不到耶!

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-3 16:55:07 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 Koenig 於 2008-12-3 16:48 發表


好奇怪
這篇在PubMed和Thorax裏都找不到
是不是還沒刊出 ???




報告!

我也找不到!

怪了!



其中必有詐!!!



[ 本文最後由 wang.hurh 於 2008-12-3 17:12 編輯 ]
發表於 2008-12-3 18:09:01 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 wang.hurh 於 2008-12-3 16:55 發表




報告!

我也找不到!

怪了!



其中必有詐!!!



是這個嗎?
http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/thx.2008.100875v1

bosm153

[ 本文最後由 hanpin1978 於 2008-12-3 18:12 編輯 ]

評分

參與人數 2現金 +10 短評 +1 收起 理由
Koenig + 10 感謝
wang.hurh + 1 神奇啊!!! 是!!!就是這個啊!!!

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-3 20:24:57 | 顯示全部樓層
Among children born by caesarean section, low birth weight, growth restriction and prematurity were more common than in those born vaginally.

我想知道是英國想要剖腹產應該也是有一定的限制才對
不是像台灣一樣病人說的算才對
如果我的解設成立
那剖腹產只用於一般當孕婦情急與胎兒供血不足時才會進行的警急措施
所以那些小孩子本身就會比一般小孩子來的有問題
若在此條件下來比較 我會說他跟剖腹產沒有直接的關係才對

評分

參與人數 1短評 +2 收起 理由
wang.hurh + 2 精品文章

查看全部評分

發表於 2008-12-4 06:23:28 | 顯示全部樓層
原文由 leomartin21 於 2008-12-3 20:24 發表
Among children born by caesarean section, low birth weight, growth restriction and prematurity were more common than in those born vaginally.

我想知道是英國想要剖腹產應該也是有一定的限制才對
不是像 ...


馬丁大夫寫的好!!!

就如同很多事件的調查、或者是一些人做一些事件的發聲一般

一開始的族群就已經有一層篩選了

得到的結論

就讓他們自己去說吧!

同時

又點出了第二個觀點

就是

台灣對於這個(剖腹產 vs 氣喘兒)

可以再做自己的調查

可以發一篇!

bosm135

德國台灣同學會論壇

GMT+1, 2024-5-15 14:14

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2020, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表